The purpose of the present study is to discuss the differences of facilitation between a facilitator and a co-facilitator in a basic encounter group by the “Co-Facilitator Method”. The group was conducted in 4 days 3 nights in 9 sessions which consisted of a facilitator, a co-facilitator and 9 members. The group structure and the group process were described. We focused on the combination of positive activation and respect for spontaneity in facilitation and then we investigated that how these different facilitation have an effect on the group
This is a case study of a trial facilitator training for structured encounter group using the \u22co...
In this study, \u22Middle-Structured Style\u22 seminary encounter group was used as a training type ...
This paper is a case study on a tarial of facilitator training for structured encounter group by “Co...
This paper is a case study on “Co-Facilitator experience” of a basic encounter group.A facititator a...
This paper is a case study on a trial of facilitator training for basic encourter group by “co-facil...
This paper is a case study on a trial of facilitaior training for structured encounter group by “Sev...
This is a case study of an encounter group using the “Collaborative Method.” Five candidates individ...
This paper is a case study on a trial of facilitator training for structured encounter group by \u22...
九州大学大学院人間環境学府九州大学大学院人間環境学研究院Graduate school of human-environment studies, Kyushu universityFaculty o...
Ⅰ.はじめに Ⅱ.グループ事例の構成 Ⅲ.グループ事例の経過 Ⅳ.考 察In this paper we have attempted to clarify the combination of th...
This is a case study of an encounter group using the \u22collaborative Method V\u22. Four facilitato...
This paper is a trial of the facilitator training for structured encounter group by using \u22Collab...
In this paper, we considered whether \u22Middle-Structured Style\u22 encounter group was suitable fo...
This is a case study of a trial of facilitator training for a structured encounter group by the \u22...
This is a case study of a trial of facilitator training for structured encounter group using the \u2...
This is a case study of a trial facilitator training for structured encounter group using the \u22co...
In this study, \u22Middle-Structured Style\u22 seminary encounter group was used as a training type ...
This paper is a case study on a tarial of facilitator training for structured encounter group by “Co...
This paper is a case study on “Co-Facilitator experience” of a basic encounter group.A facititator a...
This paper is a case study on a trial of facilitator training for basic encourter group by “co-facil...
This paper is a case study on a trial of facilitaior training for structured encounter group by “Sev...
This is a case study of an encounter group using the “Collaborative Method.” Five candidates individ...
This paper is a case study on a trial of facilitator training for structured encounter group by \u22...
九州大学大学院人間環境学府九州大学大学院人間環境学研究院Graduate school of human-environment studies, Kyushu universityFaculty o...
Ⅰ.はじめに Ⅱ.グループ事例の構成 Ⅲ.グループ事例の経過 Ⅳ.考 察In this paper we have attempted to clarify the combination of th...
This is a case study of an encounter group using the \u22collaborative Method V\u22. Four facilitato...
This paper is a trial of the facilitator training for structured encounter group by using \u22Collab...
In this paper, we considered whether \u22Middle-Structured Style\u22 encounter group was suitable fo...
This is a case study of a trial of facilitator training for a structured encounter group by the \u22...
This is a case study of a trial of facilitator training for structured encounter group using the \u2...
This is a case study of a trial facilitator training for structured encounter group using the \u22co...
In this study, \u22Middle-Structured Style\u22 seminary encounter group was used as a training type ...
This paper is a case study on a tarial of facilitator training for structured encounter group by “Co...